Relationship agreements create commonly suggest the time period into the and this amarriage ought to have taken lay

1. Yet, in the genealogy and family history, most of us knowthat per rule you will find an exception to this rule. A vexing point ofgenealogy is the fact no body very understands exactly how to apply brand new exclusions orrules that have people decisive adjective like always, possibly, probably,probably, etcetera. It could be interesting when the around almost every other examples ofjointures are produced a year or a few just after a known wedding day.

dos. Could there be an enthusiastic extant dispensation towards wedding out-of ElizabethClifford and you will Sir Ralph Bowes who have been third cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh or 4th cousins, after taken out of the fresh 5th LordClifford? Who would narrow down their relationship big date.

Arthur

Presumably, in the event the a dispensation is actually tried and you may supplied, it could havebeen from the among the many after the, and may also come in the newest correspondingregister book, whether or not it endures:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop off Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop away from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out-of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop out-of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop regarding Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop of Carlisle 1509-1520

5. When your 10th Lord Clifford does marry in early 1487 [say January] andhas E afterwards in that year, does the new chronology not works?

John arms?

Age produced for the late 1487, Henry produced inside the 1488/nine, Joan into the ,etcetera. completing the fresh new labels of send out-of . In the event that (a) thechronology nonetheless work; and (b) their own wedding portion wasn’t lower; thenwe have only the newest 1505 pedigree of Henry VII’s that’s within the oppositionto brand new supposition one to she try a legitimate daughter.

6. Regarding the 1505 pedigree: Could be the Clifford daughters the fresh onlyknown Henry VII relations omitted? Have there been anybody else? In this case,won’t one to reflect poorly about this file since a resource?

Of reviews I’ve made from this new c.1505 Henry VII Relations pedigreeswith new 1480-1500 Visitation of the North pedigrees, which happen to be

Regarding c.1505 Interactions pedigrees, this new Clifford children are not listedin a good Clifford pedigree, but instead about St. John pedigree. Due to the fact I’mnot used to brand new St. John friends, adopting the is the advice asit appears on c.1505 pedigree, just like the taken from the fresh 1834 Coll. Most readily useful. etGen. blog post. The fresh new phrasing within the quotations is strictly whilst appears inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).

“No. XII.”Out of my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess from Somerset had around three husbands.” Because of the “John https://kissbrides.com/hr/kazahstanske-zene/ Duke ofSomerset” she had “My Woman the latest King’s Mother.” that has “The new King.” whohad “Prince “From the “Sir Oliver Saint John, first husband.” she got 3 daus & dos sons:

An excellent. “Edith, wedded in order to Geoffrey Pole of Buckinghamshire.” They had:A1. “Sir Richard Rod, Knt. wedded on Lady Margaret, dau. of theDuke away from Clarence.” They had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded so you can Ralph Verney, Esq.” They had: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[an alternative youngster, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He’d four students:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” that has “Five daughters and you can oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. to help you Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young man and you can heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Age, married in order to Thomas Kent, Esq. out-of Lincolnshire.”B4. “A Nun away from Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, wedded so you can Sir Richard Frognall.” They had:C1. “Edmond Frognall with his brethren and you may sistren.” Having issueindicated, however called.C2. “Age, married so you can Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “Elizabeth, married earliest to your Lord Zouche; just after on LordScrope of Bolton.” Issue:D1. [because of the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They’d:”E. George. John. William.”D2. [because of the Scrope] ” Conyers.” That have issueindicated not named.

Margaret Duchess from Somerset, by the “Lionel Lord Welles, last partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. out-of K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Elizabeth.”