Marriage contracts would commonly imply the period of time when you look at the which amarriage must have taken set

1. But really, within the genealogy, all of us knowthat each code there clearly was an exception. A great vexing point ofgenealogy is the fact no one extremely understands exactly how to utilize this new conditions orrules which have any decisive adjective particularly usually, possibly, most likely,almost certainly, etc. It would be fascinating if there almost every other advice ofjointures getting made per year or a couple of once a well-known matrimony go out.

dos. Is there a keen extant dispensation into marriage off ElizabethClifford and you can Sir Ralph Bowes who have been third cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh or next cousins, once taken from the brand new 5th LordClifford? Who does restrict the wedding go out.

Arthur

Presumably, when the an excellent dispensation was tried and you can offered, it would havebeen of the one of several following the, and can even appear in the newest correspondingregister book, whether it survives:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop off York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop out-of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop out of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop out-of Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop out of Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop out of Carlisle 1509-1520

5. Should your tenth Lord Clifford does marry in early 1487 [say January] andhas Elizabeth after where 12 months, really does the fresh chronology not performs?

John hands?

E produced during the late 1487, Henry born into the 1488/nine, Joan for the ,an such like. filling out the names of publish off . When the (a) thechronology however performs; and (b) her matrimony piece was not reduced; thenwe have only this new 1505 pedigree out-of Henry VII’s that’s when you look at the oppositionto new supposition you to she was a legitimate child.

6. About your 1505 pedigree: Certainly are the Clifford daughters the fresh onlyknown Henry VII relations omitted? Have there been anyone else? In this case,would not one mirror badly about this document because the a resource?

Of comparisons You will find made from new c.1505 Henry VII Connections pedigreeswith brand new 1480-1500 Visitation of the North pedigrees, that are

Regarding c.1505 Relationships pedigrees, the newest Clifford youngsters are perhaps not listedin a good Clifford pedigree, but rather regarding the St. John pedigree. Because I’mnot always the fresh St. John family unit members, pursuing the is the advice asit looks regarding the c.1505 pedigree, due to the fact extracted from the fresh new 1834 Coll. Best. etGen. post. The latest phrasing inside the quotations is strictly whilst seems inthe 1834 blog post (pp. 310-311).

“No. XII.”Away from my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Rod, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess out of Somerset got three husbands.” From the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My personal Lady the fresh new King’s Mother.” who had “The Queen.” whohad “Prince “By the “Sir Oliver Saint John, first partner.” she had step three daus & 2 sons:

An excellent. “Edith, married to Geoffrey Pole out-of Buckinghamshire.” That they had:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. married towards the Lady Margaret, dau. out of theDuke out-of Clarence.” They’d: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married so you can Ralph Verney, Esq.” That they had: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[another type of child, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He had five people:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Four daughters and you can oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. so you’re able to Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, son and heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Elizabeth, wedded so you’re able to Thomas Kent, Esq. of Lincolnshire.”B4. “A great Nun out-of Shaftesbury tipiДЌne Indijanka Еѕene.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, wedded to help you Sir Richard Frognall.” They’d:C1. “Edmond Frognall with his brethren and you may sistren.” Having issueindicated, although not named.C2. “Age, married to help you Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “Age, wedded first for the Lord Zouche; immediately after to your LordScrope off Bolton.” Issue:D1. [by the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”Age. George. John. William.”D2. [by Scrope] ” Conyers.” With issueindicated although not named.

Margaret Duchess from Somerset, of the “Lionel Lord Welles, last spouse.”had: “John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. out of K. Edward IV.” andthey got “E.”